Domoticz

The topic title says it all I guess.

I'm building my own LED dimmer using LUA scripts (You can find all the information in this topic: http://www.domoticz.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=4723). Currently the best resolution that is available is using a LightwaveRF dimmer which is able to do 3% steps. This translates in 32 values available maximum.

It would be awesome if we could change it to having 1% steps available. Although using the slider interface this would be a bit hard, using scene's it would be very nice!

+1 for that!

Why would you need that? Can you see the difference between 50% brightness and 51% brightness with the naked eye ?
I am not stopping you from asking to implement it, but in a practical way i don't see the benefit of it.

ThinkPad wrote:Why would you need that? Can you see the difference between 50% brightness and 51% brightness with the naked eye ?
I am not stopping you from asking to implement it, but in a practical way i don't see the benefit of it.

My dimmer implementation has 1024 values (0 to 1023), the way light and LED's work is that steps in the lower region are much more visible then steps in the higher region. So going from 10 to 50 is VERY visible, but going from 750 to 800, while rising the same amount of light production, it isn't as visible directly.

Currently if you look at what I get from Domoticz, value 0=0, value 1=33 and value 2=66. That is a huge difference! I would just like some more control over it, with a scale of 100 it would also map nicely to 1=10, 2=20, 3=30, etc.. Having a maximum of 1000 is fine, I never drive my LED strips with max output anyway because the efficiency curve goes down quite a lot above 85% to 90% of max output.

In the future I'm thinking of implementing some sort of Logarithmic scale to even this out a bit and to make the values correspond better to the actual perceived light levels then the PWM level, but that's something for in the future.

I have about the same request, but I would rather make the sliders customisable in order to keep everybody happy. Instead of having a fixed range 0-32, I would add 2 extra fields in the Edit section of the switch (when type dimmer is chosen). With these fields you could then set the min-value and the max-value of the slider. When no values are set, you default to 0 and 32.

It's true that for higher values, this setting doesn't make difference on the visual aspect of the lights, but in the low range (<10%) it makes a huge difference.

This would be a nice addition for my project where I use a dimmer to light the individual steps of stairs with RGB strips. During the night I keep my strips at 0.5% when they are turned off, power consumption is extremely low and this adds some extra safety to the stairs.

To get something bit more usefull it might be possible to have a 32 entry table and then do a lookup.
As the LED is not linear anyway, you could have a finer resolution in the lower values.
Something like this:

http://electromotiveforces.blogspot.dk/ ... nging.html

I've made a logarithmic scaled LUA dimmer script, for anyone that might be interested.
Its hosted here on GitHub

dacora wrote:I've made a logarithmic scaled LUA dimmer script, for anyone that might be interested.
Its hosted here on GitHub

Genius, you get more precise control with dimmer. I just built Quindorians PWM control. He is using svalue*33 formula.

Comparing your logarithmic vs *33 formula:
BTW: It is now available a dummy dimmer in domoticz with 1% step, and you can use a formula like svalue*10 - but I still prefer the logarithmic method, it allows much finer control.