Has something changed in HTTPS or user session ? DOmoticz Offline problems

[zicht]

Hi,

Since latest beta's i experience domoticz offline when browsing domoticz (mostly when i change from the tab other to the tab with the lamps or weather. This is only happening since approx march. (v_4_10532 ??)

So i am wondering if something changed in domoticz or my router is creating problems. (I do not apply all updates, only once or twice a month)

After deleting browser history on my android, domotics is not longer offline, i have to log in again and it works untill i start to change tabs again and then showing offline again.

Thinking outloud : "it could be browser timeout, sessions mechanism or https mechanisms changed in domoticz ? " It used to work flawless before. or could it be related to : https://www.domoticz.com/forum/viewtop ... =6&t=27268

On local network i use only http and https is only used from outside (to protect my login details a bit more against sniffing)
Https is not testable from local network as my router blockes the loopback. When on connected locally i experience same problems on https when using local ip... A restart of domoticz or the entire hardware does not make any change.

Current version :
Version: 4.10621
Build Hash: 1687198d
Compile Date: 2019-04-27 10:30:16
dzVents Version: 2.4.18
Python Version: 3.5.3 (v3.5.3:1880cb95a742, Jan 16 2017, 15:51:26) [MSC v.1900 32 bit (Intel)]

Any thoughts where to start looking ?

Best regards

[zicht]

Hi,

Since latest beta's i experience domoticz offline when browsing domoticz (mostly when i change from the tab other to the tab with the lamps or weather. This is only happening since approx march. (v_4_10532 ??)

So i am wondering if something changed in domoticz or my router is creating problems. (I do not apply all updates, only once or twice a month)

Additional testing makes me assuming that domoticz is now giving offline as soon as my mobile ip changes. (Mobile Ip changes some times when traveling) Clearing the browser history and a new login is the solution at that point.

Is this intended behavior ?