Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

For Z-Wave related questions in Domoticz

Moderator: leecollings

Post Reply
Cletus
Posts: 54
Joined: Wednesday 17 August 2016 9:32
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: Latest
Location: Purmerend, Netherlands
Contact:

Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by Cletus »

Hello,

I could not really find the answer searching the forum, maybe I've looked incorrectly.

The question is:

I currently use Domoticz on a Rpi3 with RF-Link 433MHz. When switching a scene with lights it will fire the commands after each other, so it can happen that it takes 15 - 30 secs before all my lights are on or off. I presume this is normal behavior because it fires command after command.

If i switch to Z-Wave or Z-Wave+ will those commands be sent simultaneously or is the behavior the same? Looking for something that fires everything in one go!

Thanks!

Regards Paul
This is our world now... the world of the electron and the switch, the beauty of the baud.
Hobbybob

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by Hobbybob »

If you are using CoCo (Klik-aan-Klik-uit in Dutch since you're from the Netherlands), or something similar, you can always put the receivers in the same CoCo-"group". I have that in my house. Then you only have to send one command.
I have several of these receivers that are all in one group, but also listen to another group, so I can still operate them individually. I don't know if all receivers support listening to multiple groups at once though...
User avatar
heggink
Posts: 989
Joined: Tuesday 08 September 2015 21:44
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: 12451
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by heggink »

Depends: 433 is a shitty protocol and guarantees nothing (kaku basically shouts a couple of times and hopes for the best so if another device shouts as well, things get lost). In that sense, zwave is much better (and the key reason why I switched even my door sensors to zwave). I do find that even with zwave, devices in scenes somtimes take a few seconds to act on commands. No idea why.
Docker in Truenas scale, close to latest beta
DASHTICZ 🙃
RFXCOM, zwavejs2mqtt, zigbee2mqtt,
P1 meter & solar panel
Google home, Wifi Cams motion detection
Geofence iCloud, Bluetooth & Wifi ping
Harmony hub, Nest, lots more :-)
Cletus
Posts: 54
Joined: Wednesday 17 August 2016 9:32
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: Latest
Location: Purmerend, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by Cletus »

Interesting, thanks for the feedback so far. Indeed i use Kaku. I will check how to put them in one group. :)
This is our world now... the world of the electron and the switch, the beauty of the baud.
Hobbybob

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by Hobbybob »

You can just put them in learning-mode with the button, and assign the new group with the remote you have. After that, they listened to both groups on the remote (and therefore also in Domoticz).
User avatar
heggink
Posts: 989
Joined: Tuesday 08 September 2015 21:44
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: 12451
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by heggink »

Kaku is particularly bad: any remote sends 3 signals hoping one makes it. I have seen on multiple occasions that messages got lost. It's cheap for a reason. If you want cheap, switch to esp based technology. Downside: no commercial wall switches I know of. You could reuse kaku switches but then you are dependent on domoticz.
Docker in Truenas scale, close to latest beta
DASHTICZ 🙃
RFXCOM, zwavejs2mqtt, zigbee2mqtt,
P1 meter & solar panel
Google home, Wifi Cams motion detection
Geofence iCloud, Bluetooth & Wifi ping
Harmony hub, Nest, lots more :-)
User avatar
Stuntteam
Posts: 399
Joined: Wednesday 06 May 2015 16:39
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version:
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by Stuntteam »

I think that is a bit too negative. The current Kaku devices work well for most uses. It does send more than 3 signals and when you keep things normal in terms of number of devices and use groups to talk to multiple receivers you will not experience too much problems.
-=# RFLink Gateway Development Team #=-
Introduction: http://www.nemcon.nl/blog2/
Generic RFLink Support forum: http://www.esp8266.nu/forum/viewforum.php?f=8
User avatar
sincze
Posts: 1302
Joined: Monday 02 June 2014 22:46
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: 2024.4
Location: Netherlands / Breda Area
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by sincze »

Stuntteam wrote:I think that is a bit too negative. The current Kaku devices work well for most uses. It does send more than 3 signals and when you keep things normal in terms of number of devices and use groups to talk to multiple receivers you will not experience too much problems.
I agree with Stuntteam. I pretty much use all kinds of devices. Kaku works just fine. (started with those cheap things). I have an RFXCOM with an external antenna, but still I do however have some dead areas in my house so I installed an additional RF-LINK.
RFLINK even support more devices than the old RFXCOM (tnx Stuntteam).
In this way, my house was covered :lol: with those 433mhz devices.

However keep in mind the burst 433mhz devices like motion/dusk sensors. Stuntteam mentions that on the official RFLINK website. If you start with those.. It can get you into some serious reachability of other devices trouble.

Still the downside is, there is no 2 way communication. So Zwave or Mysensors would be a nice addition for those crucial devices. I even have a several reprogrammed Sonoff devices that also works just fine but does require a reliable wifi 2,4ghz, but then again these devices can be monitored via 'ping'.

So within every budget there is a solution and ALL can be controlled from the budget friendly Domoticz. :D
Pass2php
LAN: RFLink, P1, OTGW, MySensors
USB: RFXCom, ZWave, Sonoff 3
MQTT: ZIgbee2MQTT,
ZWAVE: Zwave-JS-UI
WIFI: Mi-light, Tasmota, Xiaomi Shelly
Solar: Omnik, PVOutput
Video: Kodi, Harmony HUB, Chromecast
Sensors: You name it I got 1.
User avatar
heggink
Posts: 989
Joined: Tuesday 08 September 2015 21:44
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: 12451
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by heggink »

True but if you need reliability (door/window sensors for an alarm system) then they are just a bad choice. Anyways, besides the point here as rfx should send signals correctly in a group and as long as nothing interferes, devices should switch.
Docker in Truenas scale, close to latest beta
DASHTICZ 🙃
RFXCOM, zwavejs2mqtt, zigbee2mqtt,
P1 meter & solar panel
Google home, Wifi Cams motion detection
Geofence iCloud, Bluetooth & Wifi ping
Harmony hub, Nest, lots more :-)
User avatar
sincze
Posts: 1302
Joined: Monday 02 June 2014 22:46
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: 2024.4
Location: Netherlands / Breda Area
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by sincze »

heggink wrote:True but if you need reliability (door/window sensors for an alarm system) then they are just a bad choice. Anyways, besides the point here as rfx should send signals correctly in a group and as long as nothing interferes, devices should switch.
A yes. missed the part about the alarm system ;-) my mistake but I do agree :D
Pass2php
LAN: RFLink, P1, OTGW, MySensors
USB: RFXCom, ZWave, Sonoff 3
MQTT: ZIgbee2MQTT,
ZWAVE: Zwave-JS-UI
WIFI: Mi-light, Tasmota, Xiaomi Shelly
Solar: Omnik, PVOutput
Video: Kodi, Harmony HUB, Chromecast
Sensors: You name it I got 1.
User avatar
heggink
Posts: 989
Joined: Tuesday 08 September 2015 21:44
Target OS: Raspberry Pi / ODroid
Domoticz version: 12451
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: Z-Wave vs 433 RF-Link

Post by heggink »

No worries. We all make our own choices based on our needs. Not everyone is into soldering esp modules .
Docker in Truenas scale, close to latest beta
DASHTICZ 🙃
RFXCOM, zwavejs2mqtt, zigbee2mqtt,
P1 meter & solar panel
Google home, Wifi Cams motion detection
Geofence iCloud, Bluetooth & Wifi ping
Harmony hub, Nest, lots more :-)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest