Domoticz

Posted: **Saturday 26 May 2018 14:58**

I would like it very much if the following syntax could be made possible:

-- example using an explicit set of names.
local mysensors = domoticz.devices({ 'sensor1', 'sensor2', 'sensor3' })

-- example using a variable that is a set of names
local switch_names = { 'switch1', 'switch2', 'switch8', 'switch 3' } 
local myswitches = domoticz.devices(switch_names)

-- or using idx values:
local myothersensors = domoticz.devices({ 23, 31, 221, 222 })

-- or both mixed:
local mythingies = domoticz.devices( { 'switch3', 43 })

Currently domoticz.devices(<idx>) or domoticz.devices(<name>) returns a single device from the set of devices, and domoticz.devices() returns the complete set of devices. domoticz.devices( <set of device names>) or domoticz.devices( <set of idx values>) would return only those devices from domoticz.devices() that have a name or idx value specified in the set. This allows for much easier coding of set operations in combination with the iterator functions .foreach(), .filter(), .reduce(), etc..

Some additional rules to make the behavior unambigious:
- If an empty set is passed in (f.e. domoticz.devices({})), an empty set should be returned. Do not raise an error like devices( <name/idx> ) does.
- if a name or an idx value is in the specified set that does not exist on a device in domoticz, ignore such non-existent names and idx-es. Do not raise an error. If you want to make sure all devices in a set exist, an easy check can be built using .filter(), or .foreach(). If however domoticz.devices({ <empty set or set with invalid name or idx> }) would raise an error, it is very hard to detect the situation and/or work around the error.
- the set can contain both idx values and names intermixed.
- if the same device can be identified by one or more names or idx values in the set, such device is only included once in the returned set. In other words, domoticz.devices({<set>}) always returns a set of unique devices.

Posted: **Saturday 26 May 2018 18:45**

@rrozema
I probably miss something or do not completely understand but if so can you please elaborate a bit on your suggestion ?
In dzVents wiki I found this and isn't this, at least partially, what you are looking for ?

Code: Select all

    local livingLights = {
        'window',
        'couch',
        33, -- kitchen light id
    }
    local lights = domoticz.devices().filter(livingLights)
    lights.forEach(function(light)
        -- do something
        light.switchOn()
    end)

Of course you can chain:

    domoticz.devices().filter(function(device)
        return (device.lastUpdate.minutesAgo > 60)
    end).forEach(function(zombie)
        -- do something with the zombie
    end)

Posted: **Saturday 26 May 2018 19:00**

Yes, that mostly does what I asked for. If however you have to do that several times, the scripts become unreadable very quickly. You have to go through several lines of code before you understand it's not doing anything functionally other than collecting the devices.

My proposal makes for a much more elegant solution, keeping the meaning of the code very clear: "give me this set of devices". It just completes the toolset, devices() = "give me all devices", devices(<idx/name>) = "give me one device", devices(<set>) = "give me these devices". Plus if we make devices(<set>) part of the dzVents toolset, danny may at some point in time find that the internal implementation can be improved on and when he implements it, all our new but also existing scripts would benefit from such improvement right away.

Posted: **Saturday 26 May 2018 20:22**

Thanks for clarifying.

Posted: **Saturday 26 May 2018 21:14**

It's even simpler:

Code: Select all

local devs = domoticz.devices().filter({'deviceA',  'deviceB'})

There is no need for your suggestion as it is already possible imho.

Posted: **Sunday 03 June 2018 20:34**

That is a nice one indeed. Yet it does not fit the pattern set by "getting all devices: .devices()" and "get one device: .devices(key)". Just the mere fact that you need to show this gimmick to us here is proof for that. My proposal is much more intuitive and adding it should not cause any backward compatibilty issues as I see it.

So, please consider adding it in a future release. You'll make a great tool even greater

Posted: **Sunday 03 June 2018 20:48**

So if I understand you correctly with

Code: Select all

local devs = { 'a', 'b', 3 }

this

Code: Select all

local devices = domoticz.devices(devs)

would return the exact same set as with

Code: Select all

local devices = domoticz.devices().filter(devs)

?

Posted: **Sunday 03 June 2018 21:12**

Yes, that's all I'm asking for

Domoticz

DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

Re: DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

Re: DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

Re: DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

Re: DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

Re: DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

Re: DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets

Re: DZVents: have devices() and groups(), etc. accept sets