Page 1 of 2
Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Saturday 09 September 2017 8:31
by Dynamic
I was watching a repo made by a Dutch website. In the end, they show a Domoticz-installation wich they can control without username/password.
Warning for all Domoticz-users: please check your security!
For the developers: maybe it’s good to make Domoticz by default only available with username/password with the need to change it after first login?
Repo:
http://www.tubantia.nl/enschede/hele-we ... ~a7e583e6/
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Saturday 09 September 2017 10:01
by snuiter
I must say I don't understand why I am still surprised this happens. The webcam is not so interesting but the fact that you can control someones home so easily that is serious. Looking at my own experience and setup you start with one device and very quickly it expands and don't review if the security is good enough, although I do have an username and password.
Agree that users of the software need to be aware that a password is a minimal requirement to assure security. Anyone has some basic tests to assure setup is secure and protected apart from the basic user/pwd setup?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 21:36
by Eddiever
I did not do a port forwarding in my router, thus my domoticz is unavailable from the outside. Or am I wrong?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:02
by SweetPants
Eddiever wrote: ↑Monday 11 September 2017 21:36
I did not do a port forwarding in my router, thus my domoticz is unavailable from the outside?
wrong, when configuring port forwarding, you open up a port from the outside. if not using HTTPS or certificates, everybody can access your domoticz system
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:05
by Eddiever
And how can I disable the access from the outside world? LIke I said, no portforwarding in my router. So how can they access my domoticz server?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:06
by pvm
SweetPants wrote: ↑Monday 11 September 2017 22:02
Eddiever wrote: ↑Monday 11 September 2017 21:36
I did not do a port forwarding in my router, thus my domoticz is unavailable from the outside?
wrong, when configuring port forwarding, you open up a port from the outside. if not using HTTPS or certificates, everybody can access your domoticz system
Huh? How can someone from outside have access when no port forwarding is configured?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:13
by Egregius
They can't, don't worry.
Without port forwarding you're 100% safe.
With port forwarding you must set a good user/password combo and only use https. On top of that use fail2ban to block failed login attempts immediately.
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:15
by Eddiever
Thanks again Egregius, now I can sleep
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:21
by mrf68
Click bait title. They bring it as "news"? Specific install of whatever software can be vulnerable. Those cameras are listed on websites for years, using default login names and passwords. TU students are surprised?? Am I missing something?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:25
by Eddiever
No click bait title. Just a warning to "less" good users of Domoticz because it shows in the video that they did have access to a domoticz server in the place Almelo (which user of this forum is from Almelo and hasn't secured his/hers server?). Grateful to topic starter!
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Monday 11 September 2017 22:35
by manjh
I have a port forwarded in the router, and I use a userid/pw to protect the user interface.
When I change the PW, I see that I need to logon with that new pw.
But once logged on, I can close/restart the browser without the need to log on. And I don't see a way to logoff...
Am I missing something?
Edit: there is a logout button. But how can I force a logout when I close the browser?
Also, how can I switch on https?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Tuesday 12 September 2017 0:45
by pvm
manjh wrote: ↑Monday 11 September 2017 22:35
I have a port forwarded in the router, and I use a userid/pw to protect the user interface.
When I change the PW, I see that I need to logon with that new pw.
But once logged on, I can close/restart the browser without the need to log on. And I don't see a way to logoff...
Am I missing something?
Edit: there is a logout button. But how can I force a logout when I close the browser?
Also, how can I switch on https?
I do not know about the logout,sorry
You can configure port forwarding for (only) your https port
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Tuesday 12 September 2017 7:48
by Dynamic
This topic was not meant to be clickbate. I just wanted to warn other users for unsafe Domoticz-installations.
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Tuesday 12 September 2017 8:16
by jannl
Egregius wrote: ↑Monday 11 September 2017 22:13
They can't, don't worry.
Without port forwarding you're 100% safe.
With port forwarding you must set a good user/password combo and only use https. On top of that use fail2ban to block failed login attempts immediately.
Basically, as long as you are connected to the internet, you are never 100% save.
But indeed, without port-forwarding you are a lot saver.
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 9:11
by poudenes
thanks for the post. Checked my system. Removed the http forwarding and leave https.
Already had a good username and password. (Use 1password to generate 20 characters passwords)
Would be nice if Domoticz add 2-way authentic verification
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 11:32
by manjh
poudenes wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 9:11
Removed the http forwarding and leave https.
Where did you do this? I checked my router, the only choices I have is TCP or UDP!
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 11:39
by jannl
http is TCP over port 80 (normally)
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 13:01
by poudenes
manjh wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 11:32
poudenes wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 9:11
Removed the http forwarding and leave https.
Where did you do this? I checked my router, the only choices I have is TCP or UDP!
I removed the forwarding in my TimeCapsule (Router)
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 13:27
by jannl
And if you use https on Domoticz, use some obscure port for forwarding, like 23456 or so.
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 13:42
by R0yk3
Why not use a vpn connection?