Page 1 of 1

Kaku apa3 1500R won't include

Posted: Sunday 11 December 2016 9:29
by Justintime
I can't get this wall socket in to Domoticz.
I have tried AC and ACR.

I have used this wall switch for several purposes in the past and made codes in Domoticz. And deleted the devices. But didn't exclude then in the switch.

I know these wall switches has a maximum codes of five I believe. When that is reached will it overwrite the first one or is it "full" and do you need to exclude the with the Off command? Before you can assign new ones?

If so how can I make it usable again? In the manual it says you can exclude them with the remote (which I don't have) pressing G. Can I simulate in Domoticz?

Re: Kaku apa3 1500R won't include

Posted: Sunday 11 December 2016 18:08
by Justintime
Is it a stupid question? I couldn't find the answer on the forum

Re: Kaku apa3 1500R won't include

Posted: Sunday 11 December 2016 18:58
by Stuntteam
I think the APA3 1500 switches store a max. of 3 addresses.
The manual mentions erasing one and all remotes.
No idea if adding a 4th remote will overwrite the 1st.
You dont know what remote ID's you used before with the switch?

Re: Kaku apa3 1500R won't include

Posted: Sunday 11 December 2016 19:27
by Amsterdam020
I have the same problem.
The Manuel says you have to push the group button on the remote for five seconds, but i don't have a Kaku remote, only rfxcom.

Re: RE: Re: Kaku apa3 1500R won't include

Posted: Sunday 11 December 2016 21:03
by Justintime
Stuntteam wrote:I think the APA3 1500 switches store a max. of 3 addresses.
The manual mentions erasing one and all remotes.
No idea if adding a 4th remote will overwrite the 1st.
You dont know what remote ID's you used before with the switch?
No, never thought of removing the codes. And no I don't know the codes.... ACR maybe... But AC? Image.

Re: Kaku apa3 1500R won't include

Posted: Monday 12 December 2016 22:39
by Justintime
So throwing away is the only option I guess?

Re: Kaku apa3 1500R won't include

Posted: Tuesday 13 December 2016 0:51
by Stuntteam
I doubt that.. if there is no other way, one could go for a brute force