Page 2 of 2
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 13:54
by manjh
R0yk3 wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 13:42
Why not use a vpn connection?
Sounds like a better solution.
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 14:00
by dervogt
how about using the login page of domoticz together with the well documented reverse nginx proxy setup from the wiki, this is as secure as you can get at this moment of time.....
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 14:14
by jannl
That is indeed the best solution I think, but a bit harder to configure for a lot of people
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 14:59
by manjh
jannl wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 14:14
That is indeed the best solution I think, but a bit harder to configure for a lot of people
Well, after upgrading my Domoticz server HW to a R-Pi-3, I have a spare type-2 laying around. I'll have a go at setting that up as VPN server.
Or is it safe enough to run VPN on the same Pi as Domoticz?
Somehow it "feels" like a better solution to keep them separate, but....

Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 15:44
by jannl
Seperate seems better. My VPN runs on my router (Fritzbox)
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 17:08
by manjh
jannl wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 15:44
Seperate seems better. My VPN runs on my router (Fritzbox)
Ah, there's an idea! I have a modem from my supplier that might hack it, and if that doesn't I can always try my own router (Netgear R9000). Thanks for the tip! I hadn't thought of that.

Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 17:33
by Jan Jansen
jannl wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 15:44
Seperate seems better. My VPN runs on my router (Fritzbox)
Why do you think it seems? What are the real risks?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 17:58
by jannl
As long as the vpn is not the first entry point, other hosts might get exppsed. Also depending on the security of your router.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G930F met Tapatalk
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 20:52
by Jan Jansen
I installed Domoticz and Openvpn on 1 rpi. In my router I only opened the openvpn port. At this point I'm a noob but I thought I'm safe. Now I'm beginning to doubt. Is that doubt right?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Thursday 21 September 2017 21:15
by jannl
You are safe enough. No one will ever be 100% safe. Keep everything updated and you are good.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G930F met Tapatalk
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Friday 22 September 2017 9:45
by R0yk3
manjh wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 17:08
jannl wrote: ↑Thursday 21 September 2017 15:44
Seperate seems better. My VPN runs on my router (Fritzbox)
Ah, there's an idea! I have a modem from my supplier that might hack it, and if that doesn't I can always try my own router (Netgear R9000). Thanks for the tip! I hadn't thought of that.
I let my (ziggo) router put in Bridge modus. So my router (r7000 with merlin firmware) handles directly the VPN requests. Works like a charm behind that i have my domoticz behind a password no https.
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Sunday 24 September 2017 19:50
by manjh
I decided to go the safe way: installed a VPN server, added it to my Domoticz R-Pi3.
Installation was really simpel: PiVPN. Check it out, it installs itself and only asks for a few minor things.
CPU load on the R-Pi did not increase much, it used to be at a steady 3%, now at 4.5%. Still well within safety margins.
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Sunday 24 September 2017 20:22
by Derik
how can i install fal to ban on my rpi near domoticz?
Re: Dutch Newspaper: poor security for public camera’s. Specific Domoticz-install also vulnerable!
Posted: Sunday 24 September 2017 20:29
by Egregius
apt-get install fail2ban?