2026.2
Windows
Philips Hue
Prior to 2026.2, Philips Hue hardware could be configured to use non-standard ports, allowing remote V2 Hue bridges behind port-forwarded routers. After upgrading to 2026.2 the port field disappeared and Domoticz now only attempts V2 HTTPS/443, V1 HTTPS/443 and V1 HTTP/80, causing previously functional remote bridges to fail.
The only remedy seems to be to revert to 2026.1. Are there likely to be any fixes or workarounds?
Philips Hue hardware non-standard ports
Moderators: leecollings, remb0
Forum rules
Before posting here, make sure you are on the latest Beta or Stable version.
If you have problems related to the web gui, clear your browser cache + appcache first.
Use the following template when posting here:
Version: xxxx
Platform: xxxx
Plugin/Hardware: xxxx
Description:
.....
If you are having problems with scripts/blockly, always post the script (in a spoiler or code tag) or screenshots of your blockly
If you are replying, please do not quote images/code from the first post
Please mark your topic as Solved when the problem is solved.
Before posting here, make sure you are on the latest Beta or Stable version.
If you have problems related to the web gui, clear your browser cache + appcache first.
Use the following template when posting here:
Version: xxxx
Platform: xxxx
Plugin/Hardware: xxxx
Description:
.....
If you are having problems with scripts/blockly, always post the script (in a spoiler or code tag) or screenshots of your blockly
If you are replying, please do not quote images/code from the first post
Please mark your topic as Solved when the problem is solved.
-
mikedavies1953
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thursday 09 January 2020 19:24
- Target OS: Windows
- Domoticz version:
- Contact:
-
mikedavies1953
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thursday 09 January 2020 19:24
- Target OS: Windows
- Domoticz version:
- Contact:
Re: Philips Hue hardware non-standard ports
I see Stable 2026.3 is now out with no sign of any acknowledgment of the use of non-standard ports. Does this mean that there will not be a solution and we have to go back to using the standard ports? Is this a security thing?