Search found 38 matches
- Sunday 29 August 2021 8:41
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
TY! I'm trying to set it at 30 minutes ...
- Thursday 26 August 2021 20:38
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
I looked aroud for such rescan, but I could not find it. Which is the field?
- Thursday 26 August 2021 18:35
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
Ho can I force the refresh of Alarm status (Engaged/Disengaged) for a burglar alarm? Somewhen domoticz fails to show the changing of the status, mostly when I disengage it. No way to refresh the page, until the whole domoticz is restarted, then it shows the new status. I would like to make some kind ...
- Thursday 22 October 2020 9:02
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
I see clearly, now it's more affordable. I did not know the ordering rules for assigning the IDs.
I do not have a zone 00 but I have two F422 interfaces to alarm and to video intercom. Maybe that's the origin of 0010 and 0011.
Thank you!
I do not have a zone 00 but I have two F422 interfaces to alarm and to video intercom. Maybe that's the origin of 0010 and 0011.
Thank you!
- Wednesday 21 October 2020 8:43
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
I have nothing in my configuration with Area 0. Lights are managed by 5 x F411/4 so configured: zone 1 PL1-4 zone 1 PL 5-7 (1 actuator is free) zone 2 PL 1 (3 actuators are free) zone 4 PL1-4 (still not used ino domoticz) zone 4 PL 5-8 (still not used in domoticz) zone 3 is devoted to shutters ...
- Tuesday 20 October 2020 13:34
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Help identifying unknown device
I have an unknown device not used but always ON in my devices list. It's ID 1000A named LIGHT 0010.
Here are all the light devices, please could you help me addressing how to discover what is that? If I delete unused devices it reappears after a while.
Thank you!!!!
Here are all the light devices, please could you help me addressing how to discover what is that? If I delete unused devices it reappears after a while.
Thank you!!!!
- Sunday 18 August 2019 21:39
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
Now I'm using both gateways and two softwares (Domoticz and Openhab). I would like to reorganize the system without new expenses. You suggestion is really useful: I can use both gateways, defining the devices supported by each one. TY for this smart suggestion!
- Sunday 18 August 2019 9:40
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
TY very much. In this case I'm still in trouble because the only way to control my 3486 is via unofficial gateway LN4890: I have no GSM field here. I suppose that if the limitation is in MHS1, neither Openhab will support the 3486 via AUX channels. Very sad to see that I have no other solution than ...
- Saturday 17 August 2019 18:50
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
I already did this test: defining the MHS1 as a new hardware, after restarting domoticz I have created all new OWN devices as unused, but I find nothing related to the alarm, while if I do the same test using the actual Touch 3.5 LN4890 as gateway I have several devices: 46 MyHome_OTC 19 1 ALARM ...
- Saturday 17 August 2019 17:20
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
I saw it this morning at first check after update, but after a hour it stopped to see the various devices and i had to return back to the old gw to see them again as new devices. I'm sure it worked once because I engaged and disengaged once and it logget that, then no more, also after restarting.
- Saturday 17 August 2019 16:31
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
In effect the burglar alarm does no more work with mhs1 gw. I tried to delete the devices and they are not discovered after restarting domoticz. All unused devices are rediscovered if deleted, but not the ones related to the burglar alarm. Maybe it is not supperted in this version.
- Saturday 17 August 2019 14:18
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
Perfect! I switched to MHS1 and everything is working with old data from db.
Only a minor change: in the alarm status for the Burglar Alarm I received Engaged/Disengaged. Now the result is (1) Engaged/(0) Disengaged.
Is there a way to take away the number from the staus output? TY
Only a minor change: in the alarm status for the Burglar Alarm I received Engaged/Disengaged. Now the result is (1) Engaged/(0) Disengaged.
Is there a way to take away the number from the staus output? TY
- Saturday 17 August 2019 12:53
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
At first look everything is going well. I would like to switch to MHS1 to have a complete test but I do not know how to save my historical data from temperature sensors. I see that mhs1 has a complete new set of devices and in the db I have over a year of old data related to different IDs. Is there ...
- Saturday 17 August 2019 10:42
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
I just upgraded to 11207 and tried to define the mhs1 gateway, but it continues to ask for a numeric only password. I have an alphanumeric password with a special character on MHS1 and the message does not like it. After changing the password to a 1-9, a-z, A-Z only, it seems to work. I have to ...
- Thursday 08 August 2019 13:54
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
Sad to hear you are alone in such good job. I had to move to Openhab because it does have the complete support for MHS1 and all the other things I have. The only feature still unsupported is the AUX channel, but it now supports the integration with Google Home and is growing faster.
TY anyway
TY anyway
- Tuesday 06 August 2019 9:56
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
It seems that Domoticz completely forgot Openwebnet. My last question here was a year ago and was never answered. I moved to Openhab2.
- Sunday 26 May 2019 9:13
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
TY for the silent answer.
Bye!
Bye!
- Saturday 11 August 2018 13:26
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
Is OpenWebNet still supported? Maybe BTicino does no more support it? Please help me to decide if I should continue this way or think to something else... I still wait for them to release the MHS1 support, and after a year, still no answer. I would like to know your opinion.
TY in advance
TY in advance
- Saturday 14 July 2018 9:53
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Re: OpenWebNet developing..?
In relation to previous question: is there a simple way to "monitor" the BUS? I mean, I'm able to write programs so I would like to have a way to read the bus and to write commands to it. I have tried several apps or programs, but no one gives the function to read/write the bus. Maybe I have lost it ...
- Thursday 12 July 2018 21:08
- Forum: Others
- Topic: OpenWebNet developing..?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 47696
Problem with temperature setpoint
I have two LN4691 (no central, they are setted as residential). From domoticz I can read the temperatures, and now I discovered also two new devices, called thermostat setpoint. I tried to use them, I can see the actual temp, but if I change the setpoint, it does not apply to LN4691. Is it a bug or ...